FS50732284

The complainant requested information on the correspondence from a named Professor. Durham University (the University) initially confirmed that it did not hold any information but on internal review found and disclosed some information. The complainant considered that more information must be held. The Commissioner’s decision is that the University does not hold any further information…

FS50739797

The complainant has requested information about Bedfordshire Police’s capabilities with regard to utilising the “Internet of Things” for law enforcement purposes. Bedfordshire Police would neither confirm nor deny whether it holds the requested information, citing the exemption at section 31(3) (law enforcement) of the FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that Bedfordshire Police was not entitled…

FS50739828

The complainant has requested information about Bedfordshire Police’s capabilities with regard to utilising the “Internet of Things” for law enforcement purposes. Bedfordshire Police would neither confirm nor deny whether it holds the requested information, citing the exemption at section 31(3) (law enforcement) of the FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that Bedfordshire Police was not entitled…

FS50739835

The complainant has requested information about Cambridgeshire Constabulary’s capabilities with regard to utilising the “Internet of Things” for law enforcement purposes. Cambridgeshire Constabulary would neither confirm nor deny whether it holds the requested information, citing the exemption at section 31(3) (law enforcement) of the FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that Cambridgeshire Constabulary was not entitled…

FS50739852

The complainant has requested information about Cambridgeshire Constabulary’s capabilities with regard to utilising the “Internet of Things” for law enforcement purposes. Cambridgeshire Constabulary would neither confirm nor deny whether it holds the requested information, citing the exemption at section 31(3) (law enforcement) of the FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that Cambridgeshire Constabulary was not entitled…

FS50739875

The complainant has requested information about Staffordshire Police’s capabilities with regard to utilising the “Internet of Things” for law enforcement purposes. Staffordshire Police would neither confirm nor deny whether it holds the requested information, citing the exemption at section 31(3) (law enforcement) of the FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that Staffordshire Police was not entitled…

FS50740436

The complainant has requested information about Staffordshire Police’s capabilities with regard to utilising the “Internet of Things” for law enforcement purposes. Staffordshire Police would neither confirm nor deny whether it holds the requested information, citing the exemption at section 31(3) (law enforcement) of the FOIA. The Commissioner’s decision is that Staffordshire Police was not entitled…

FER0783541

The complainant has made two information requests about various specified locations in Ramsey, Cambridgeshire. Cambridgeshire County Council (“the Council”) responded by either providing held information, requesting clarification, or confirming that it does not hold the requested information. The Commissioner’s decision is that in respect of request 1 and request 2 (parts 1, 3 and 4)…

FS50718974

The complainant requested information relating to an aircraft incident that occurred on 17 August 1988, and which caused the death of the then president of Pakistan, and then ambassador to Pakistan for the United States of America. The Home Office refused to confirm or deny whether information was held and cited the exemptions provided by…

FER0755489

The complainant has requested DEFRA to disclose copies of all of the briefing notes and information given to Therese Coffey which include references to fly-tipping. DEFRA responded to the request citing regulation 12(5)(b) of the EIR. In accordance with regulation 11 of the EIR, the complainant requested an internal review. But to the date of…